The Hill
Thursday, August 21, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Editorial arrow Slaughter’s journey
Editorial PDF Print E-mail
Slaughter’s journey
Posted: 05/06/08 05:33 PM [ET]

In 1995, the same year Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) first introduced her bill seeking to ban genetic discrimination, the “Macarena” song was popular and “Braveheart,” “Toy Story” and “Apollo 13” were the hot movies.

For over a decade, Slaughter’s bill did not move through the House. The legislation, which would prohibit employers from using genetic screening information in hiring decisions, attracted bipartisan support. In the 108th Congress, for example, the legislation had 242 co-sponsors.

It also enjoyed broad support in the upper chamber, where Sens. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) touted companion legislation.

Yet the employer community raised concerns and House GOP leaders declined to move the bill.

Democrats made the Slaughter legislation a top priority after taking control of the House, which passed the bill last year 420-3. The final version last week cleared 414-1. Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) voted no.

The bill was altered to appease Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) and the White House and will soon be signed by President Bush.

Slaughter called the measure the “most important thing I have ever done in my life.”

In a recent release, Slaughter said, “Since no one is born with perfect genes, each one of us is a potential victim of genetic discrimination. By prohibiting the improper use of genetic information, this bill encourages Americans to undergo the testing necessary for early treatment and prevention of genetic-based diseases.”

The Chamber of Commerce still opposes the bill, but stresses that it agrees that genetic discrimination should be banned. The Chamber is, however, skeptical about how the legislation will function in practice, believing that innocent businesses could unfairly face major penalties. It will be interesting to see how the new law works, or fails to work.

This newspaper is not endorsing the legislation, but taking note of the legislative achievement. Slaughter, 78, was patient. And even though the odds were against her when Republicans controlled Congress, she urged lawmakers on both sides of the aisle to sign on to her bill.

At the end of each Congress, Slaughter’s bill would die, only to be revived at the start of the next one. Finally, her legislation has reached the intended destination of all bills — the president’s desk.

Slaughter has been criticized by Republicans for her management of the Rules Committee in the 110th Congress, but despite that bitter tension, every GOP Rules Committee member voted for her bill.

Slaughter will now move on to her next legislative goal, but before that happens, she deserves to be applauded for reaching the finish line of a 13-year journey.

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.
test img test img test img test img test img