The Hill
Sunday, September 07, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Editorial arrow Wasting floor time
Editorial PDF Print E-mail
Wasting floor time
Posted: 04/30/08 05:38 PM [ET]

The House this week scheduled floor votes on legislation establishing a national watermelon month, expressing support for designating a “National Funeral Director and Mortician Recognition Day,” and congratulating the University of Iowa’s wrestling team.

Reading this, it is perhaps not difficult to fathom at least one reason why congressional ratings are so low.

There has been plenty of discussion about whether earmarks should be banned. Yet there has been little to no debate on eradicating silly measures of the type cited above.

House leaders note that many pieces of policy-rich legislation are being ironed out at the committee level and will soon hit the floor. Fair enough.

But why even have floor votes on these trivial measures?

This is not a Democratic or Republican issue, though it is mostly confined to the House. The Senate moves slowly enough that it doesn’t schedule nearly as many votes on the superfluous measures.

House Republicans have lambasted Democrats for scheduling so many post office-naming bills in an effort to label the 110th Congress a “do-nothing” legislature.

Yet the sponsors of the watermelon and funeral director measures are Republicans. And GOP lawmakers have had plenty of post office bills get floor votes since Democrats assumed the majority.

All matters that hit the House floor need not be equally serious or weighty. This newspaper realizes that the House is a place for debate and an occasional light moment. But the resolutions on non-important matters need to be reduced, especially if at the same time people complain that there is too little time to get a lot of work done.

Some will argue that these measures work well back home in the districts of House members. That’s certainly true, but more importantly, these type of measures expose the House to justified criticism and can unjustly portray lawmakers as being out of touch with real problems.

With the economy on the ropes and the country at war, the House should make some changes.

Pass these watermelon and post office bills. Just don’t pass them on the House floor.

Do it at the committee level, and unless there is an objection, these measures would be passed and enacted. These resolutions should not require floor time. It would be better if the House floor is silent than debating the merits of watermelon month, especially when no one objects.

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.